Tampilkan postingan dengan label running. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label running. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 05 Mei 2016

Guide to Running Shooting Lines

0

Explore various types of running line options

The biggest hurdle for many people that are just starting out with two handed rods is understanding all of the terminology and gear that is so specialized with in this sport. Today, we are going to discuss running/shooting lines.

A running/shooting line is a crucial part of your spey fishing set-up. There are many, many varieties of these lines and each has advantages and drawbacks. Let’s start by learning what a running and/or shooting line is:

A standard weight-forward floating line is pretty easy to understand. Tie it on to your backing, reel it up and tie a leader on to the front end. You’re ready to fish. If you look at a “line profile” for a RIO Perception (just an example, choose any line), you will notice that there is a 36’ head and a 54’ running line. The running line is a thin diameter, level (has no “taper” and does not change diameter) floating line with minimal weight/resistance that is attached to the back end of the head.

RIO InTouch Perception
A spey set-up is not much different, except for that the head and the running line are separated, then connected by a loop to loop system. This allows spey fishermen to change out the heads for different applications without having to carry spare spools.

Running lines for spey rods come in a wide range of options. There are different materials, diameters and textures to consider. I have chosen a few of my favorites to talk about. Remember that there is no perfect line for every application and person, but every angler will have personal preferences to what works best for them and what features are a priority in choosing a line.

PREMIUM LINES

RIO ConnectCore

This is in the running (pun intended) for my favorite all-around line. I would feel comfortable using this line year round in most conditions. It floats, and shoots well, which are definite advantages; but the big draw to this line is the “connect core”. The connect core does not stretch, and most important; every little rock, leaf and fish is felt through the whole line with maximum response. The minimal stretching also means that there is no energy lost in your cast. With a typical line (standard fishing lines stretch up to 22%), when a cast hits it’s anchor point, it has to stretch out quite a bit during the change in direction, which results in a loss of energy. There is no loss of energy with the Connect Core, which means longer, easier casts. I cannot stress how much of a difference it makes to be able to feel the energy in the line.
Feel More with ConnectCore

It is available in four sizes (.026”, .032”, .037” and .042”). I prefer a .032” or .037” diameter for my 7wt spey rod, and definitely the .032” for my 6wt in the summer. The .026” is great for those little trout spey rods and the .042” is good for your 14’ and longer rods.

There is an increasing diameter (taper) on the front “handling section” which I really like as a larger diameter line is easier to handle, especially if you have numb hands or are generally clumsy. It’s not much of an increase, but every little bit helps, and the color change helps me know how far I have to go before I cast again. I can carry my loops more evenly when I see the color change coming.

Drawbacks: From my personal use I have noticed that it tends to get twisted up over time; a little more than other lines. This can be caused by a double spey cast which naturally puts a twist in the line, or a poorly tied fly that spins in the current. It can be solved with the RIO Anti-Twist Spey Swivels, which are awesome if you tend to use a double spey on a regular basis.
Eliminate Twist Problems
The twisting is definitely not enough to stop me from using it, or even consider, but I have to be conscious of how it is looking after a day or two of fishing hard. I have occasionally had to take the head off and strip the running line down to the backing while it hangs in the current. This will naturally untwist the line; then you’re good to go for quite a while.

Overall though, this is a top shelf, year-round line, perfect for anglers that prefer a traditional feeling line and anglers that like the newest technology (ConnectCore).

Scientific Anglers Dragon Tail

So this is not a new concept, but I think that S/A has nailed it for this line. The big idea for this line is that there is a 15’ tapered section on the front which increases the diameter of the line from .038” to .075”. The diameter increases to the point where the transition between the head and running line has a minimal difference in diameter. The big taper results in a smoother transfer of energy from the running line to the head with tighter loops and straighter casts.
Dragon Tail

This running line has seen a lot of action this past winter on my steelhead rod, and has become my go-to line. I like it for several reasons. The first is the ease of handling and fishing. Cold hands have a hard time gripping small thin lines. This thicker line is definitely the easiest to handle of any shooting line that I have tried (but I have not tried them all…). The thickness of this line helps to minimize tangles, and I have noticed fewer tangles than most other lines… The textured feature adds to the ease of handling and increases distance, as well as being easier to pick up off the water during your cast due to the “dimples” that create the textured effect.

I have dubbed this line the “lazy man’s running line” because it casts well with a varying amount of “hang down”. Hang down is the amount of running line that is outside of the tip of the rod at the beginning of the cast. Most people have very little excess running line “hanging down” when they begin their cast, but because of the unique taper, the Dragon Tail casts well with up to and over a foot of hang down… meaning I don’t have to be as precise when prepping for my next cast… a.k.a. the lazy man’s cast. I was experimenting the other night with it and was casting with about 4’ of hang down out of the tip of the rod. It wasnt really pretty, but it was casting as far as I needed it to go and it was far more hang down than I can do with any other running line.
S/A claims this line to be either 20# or 25# strength (depending on where you look), which, if true, is pushing it a bit. Not because I plan on catching a huge fish, but because I have snagged my head up in a tree (yes, I admit that). I do not want to test the break strength of the loops on this line if it is only 20#, but I haven’t had any problems yet…

Garry Sandstrom, our awesome Scientific Angler’s sales rep told me that there is a dedicated group of guys that are fishing this line with short sections of T-8 through T-20 just off the running line in a Czech nymphing, tight line system for fishing little slots that you would be unable to get to with a big head and spey head. It’s an outside-the-box approach that has a lot of potential around here.

BRAIDED LINES


I once saw an inspirational speaker in middle school. He let us know that “we are more alike than different”. When it comes to braided running lines; that is the truth. Outside of braided lines, there are many options to choose from in tons of features, textures, ridges, tapers, diameters and everything in between… As far as braided lines go, the biggest difference is the color.

I have used braided lines as far back as I can remember. I believe that my first running line after ditching the old Rio Windcutter line was a braided line. While there are some nice features of these lines, there are also some drawbacks that make them poor choices for beginning anglers. I honestly couldnt tell the difference between the following lines if I was blindfolded casting or if they were the same color, so it’s really just a preference of color and whether you want 105’ (Airflo) or 150’ (Scientific Anglers) of running line. I’ll try not to repeat myself too much in these two line reviews…

Airflo Miracle Braid

Airflo’s Miracle Braid has a single strand poly core and a .032” diameter. It also floats, shoots a mile and a half and doesn’t stretch. These are all great features of a running line. The tangle factor is minimal and is very durable.
Miracle Braid

It all sounds perfect, right? Well there are some things to consider before grabbing one of these lines. The first thing is texture. The braids tend to pull a lot of water through the guides, which is fine in the summer, but not in the winter. Besides ice building up in the guides very quickly, small shards of ice can form in the texture if it is very cold and can potentially cut you. The texture itself is fairly rough and not very easy on the hands.

Another factor to consider is that there are no pre-built loops on this line, but building them is not very difficult. Some people really love a simple line that goes right from the spool onto a reel with no excess work. Ten minutes to build a loop is a small price to pay for a good line.

A third thing to consider is that it is fairly loud going through the guides, but that should only bother the most discerning of anglers.

If you can deal with those little factors, this is an awesome line for a lot of anglers. Overall, the benefits of this line outweigh the negatives by quite a bit, so for the right angler, this is a quality choice. I have fished Miracle Braid for years and will definitely string it up again sometime in the future.

Scientific Anglers Braided PE

This is a braided Polyethylene mono-filament with a .032” diameter. As I stated in the intro to braided lines, they are more alike than different. I fished this line for most of the past year and do really enjoy it. There is no stretch and minimal tangling. It floats and is very, very durable. You can beat the snot out of this line and it does not crack or fade or get tacky over time. This line shoots very well and is a nice diameter to keep hold of.

Braided lines all have the same drawbacks; they pick up a lot of water spray during casting, so ice builds up quickly on guides and can form small icy shards on the line in very cold conditions. This can cause cuts on sensitive fingers (I have a scar to prove it). I took it off my reel after a couple of days of fighting icy guides and a bleeding finger this winter, but I look forward to fishing it again this summer.

This line does not have any loops built in, so the angler must do it themselves (or bring it in to the shop). Building loops is easy enough, but is a task that many anglers don’t want to deal with.

I am very pleased with this line and will continue to fish it for years to come. If you are looking for something different that a traditional coated running line, this is a solid choice for intermediate to advanced anglers. Again, beginners are best served by using a traditional coated line that mimics the feel of a standard floating single-hand line until they have enough experience to know what features are a priority for them in a new running line.
Note: We currently do not stock this line due to virtually no demand for it. If you which to purchase it please call us and we can accommodate your order

MONOFILAMENT LINES

RIO Slickshooter / Gripshooter

Now if you are looking for a line that has the most potential for distance casting, a monofilament running line must be in the arsenal. I know more guides that fish Slickshooter than any other line, so that should be a good indication of its potential.

RIO Slickshooter
The RIO Slickshooter is a colored flat (oval) monofilament. Monofilament shooting lines have been used by steelhead fly fishermen to get maximum distance since Amnesia became popular in California in the 1960s. Rio’s version comes in 25#, 35# 44# and 50# varieties and I prefer the 50# version. Why, because as I admitted earlier, I have stuck a head up in a tree… The last time I did it I was using 50# Slickshooter and I definitely needed somewhere around 40# of pressure to get it out…

A big advantage of monofilament lines is that there is very little “water spray” from this line if you are fishing it below freezing temperatures. This minimizes ice building up in your guides; however, it is harder to deal with the smaller diameter of this line if your hands are cold…

The RIO Gripshooter is an improved version of Slickshooter. Improved? Rio has built a loop on the front and coated the first 17’ of the line with a traditional style PVC coating that makes it easier to handle. For me, the original version is just fine. For someone transitioning to mono for the first time, the Gripshooter is a great choice.
RIO GripShooter

So there are a few drawbacks to consider with these lines. If you are willing to deal with them, then monofilament running lines can have some serious potential for you. The first is that it does not float. If you are in “frog water” the line will slowly sink. It is difficult to pull the line out of the water during your cast in this situation. It’s not as bad in faster moving water, but it is a concern.

Another drawback is durability. Monofilament will wear down quicker than most others. I got a full summer out of my last spool of Slickshooter, but it was far past spent by the end of the season. It needs to be replaced more frequently, but you can buy almost four spools of Slickshooter for the cost one ConnectCore or Dragon Tail, so you must think of this as more disposable than others.

A third thing to consider is that monofilament needs to be stretched out and has a tendency to coil up. When I get to the river, I take forty or fifty feet of running line off my reel and stretch it out before I start fishing. This helps negate the coiling (memory) issue that mono can have. The memory issues are almost non-existent when its 100 degrees on the Deschutes, but that’s not something that everyone tends to experience. There are also no loops on a spool of Slickshooter, but it is very easy to tie a triple surgeon’s loop on each end; you just have to make sure that the oval shape lays down flat when you do the knot and some guys like to coat it with UV knot sense to make it smooth.

Scientific Angler’s Floating 0.021" Mono

0.021" Hollow Mono
This is the “sleeper” running line of the bunch. It’s a hollow-core monofilament running line that addresses a few of the problems that traditional monofilament has and includes a few improvements. This line is a .021” diameter with 36# break strength. Again, mono has very little water spray, so this is a great line for the winter if you can keep your hands warm. On the plus side, it’s easier to keep your hands warm when there is little to no water coming off of your running line.

While traditional monofilament line sinks, this line is hollow and floats! It has a nice diameter that is easy to handle and does not coil up as much as some monofilaments. It still requires some initial stretching when you get out on the water, especially on a cold day, but it’s nothing to worry about.

While this line does not have any pre-built loops either, a triple surgeon’s loop has a very small profile on the line as it “seats” into the hollow part of the line. Overall, this line has a lot of potential, but gets overlooked by most anglers. I have not used it myself, Ive only talked to people that fish it, but the guys that use it are very pleased with it. I plan on trying it out the next time I need a new running line.

TRADITIONAL LINES

Airflo Ridge Running Line

Airflo Ridge Running Line
I fished this running line for over a year with little to no complaints. It is a traditional extruded fly line style, but has microscopic ridges that run along the line that improves shooting distance due to the reduction of friction on the rod guides. Less line touching the guides equals more distance. This running line comes in 20# and 30# versions. We sell tons of them and Airflo always makes high-quality products.

This line is made with a PVC-free urethane coating, which is more resistant to UV rays, and chemicals like sunscreen and bug spray. It also fades and cracks less than PVC, which should give it a longer lifespan. Ridge Running line is a solid choice for beginners, the occasional spey caster, and anyone that enjoys a traditional feeling line that is easy to deal with, has minimal tangling and can be fished year round.

RIO Powerflex Shooting Line

The RIO Powerflex Shooting Line is a quality traditional coated running line. There are no frills or gimmicks to this line. I don’t really need to go into much detail about this line since it is by far our best selling running line. It’s just a solid American built line that is tough, shoots well, stands up to a variety of fishing conditions and has a nice feel to it. The .030” and .035” are solid choices for 7wt spey rods, while the .040” is great on 8wt rods and above. The .024” lines up well on trout-sized switch and spey rods.
RIO PowerFlex Shooting Line

It does have loops on it, floats well, shoots well and is easy to handle. Since it is the most like a single hand fly line in feel, it is the go-to line for beginners. We sell more of these than any other running line because of the quality, price tag and ease of use. While there are no fancy ridges, textures or tapers, it gets the job done and it does it very well at a good price.

There is no perfect line for everyone and every condition. I have tried most of the running lines on the market at some point and I go back and forth depending on my mood and what I am willing to deal with. Each line has advantages and drawbacks that can fit a person’s style and abilities. What works for one guy may not work for another and what works well for summer steelhead may not be the best choice for winter steelhead. All I can do is relate my experiences with these lines and let you know what I like and am using; so….

As of time of publishing the following lines are on my steelhead reels:


Scientific Anglers Dragon Tail is on my 7wt spey and is my current “go-to” setup. I have fished it more this winter than any other. The Rio ConnectCore .032” on my “other” winter rod has seen plenty of action this year, but does not get the daily use that the Dragon Tail does, but I am moving it to my go-to reel because John wanted to try the Dragon Tail for a while. These two lines are the most expensive, but they are both in another class as far as the features. The great thing is that both of them have the right features that could give you the ability to improve your experience. I consider these to be the two premier running lines on the market today.

On my 6wt, which is currently in my closet, patiently waiting for the Deschutes fish to move in, I am using Rio 50# Slickshooter and am on my third spool of it since I started at the shop here. The Deschutes has quite a few spots where distance casting is highly beneficial, and I believe that there is no better line for casting long distances on warm days in warm water with dry lines.

I have a plastic tote filled with used lines, including several spools of Slickshooter, a couple of braided lines and some Airflo Ridge line for emergencies and backups. I would not hesitate to fish any of them in a heartbeat under the right conditions.

Again, we are always happy to answer any questions you may have on gear or if you just need some encouragement to get out of the office for an afternoon. Stop on by or give us a call and tight lines!





Andrew Perrault
Gorge Fly Shop | Product Specialist
541.386.6977





"Fly Fish the World with Us"


Read more

Rabu, 20 April 2016

Whiskers and Woolly Buggers on the Prairies

0

No Trout or Steelhead here but dont let your grip loose on your rod

Catfish on the fly!?

Although this article is written with a particular destination in mind, the tactics can probably be applied to thousands of spots across the continent.

The Red River is broad and muddy – similar to the Mississippi River but not quite as big. It winds between North Dakota and Minnesota then crosses over into Canada. It runs through cities and farmlands and it actually seems quite unremarkable, unless you like catfish…

Type “catfish” and “Red River” into Google and see what results. The Red River is a turbid jewel in the world of channel catfish. All kinds of fisherman flock to it, searching for hard-pulling brutes. An average channel cat on the Red weighs a solid 8 to 12 pounds. Hundreds of 20 to 30 pounders are caught each year.

Although channel catfish on the Red River are generally targeted with conventional tackle, they are a becoming a legitimate growing target for fly anglers. Much of the long rod action takes place in Lockport, Manitoba where a large control dam spreads across the river and creates a few hundred yards of swirling, rippled water. Prime time is late May through early July but good fishing can be had throughout the summer and into September.

Lockport Dam, Manitoba
Although the entire Red River holds catfish, in many locations they are often in fairly deep holes beyond the reach of most flies. The turbulent water downstream of the Lockport dam seems to attract shallow, feeding fish through most the open water season.

The standard procedure is to get the fly down close to the bottom along current seams, flats, drop-offs, and eddies. Drop-offs can be tough to find unless you have a boat and a depth finder; however, they often reveal themselves during low water and smart anglers make a mental note for when the water is higher.

I like a cast that quarters upstream and sinks before I strip the fly in one foot at a time. Sometimes, I merely jig the rod tip up and down as the fly drifts. Feeling the fly tick bottom every now and then is mandatory. When the fly line is quartering downstream, it’s time to cast again.

Proven effective flies
Not surprisingly, my fly selection is inspired by the bait fisherman who use cut chunks of river-caught goldeye, a small silvery fish. White marabou, since it looks like a piece of fish, is often part of the pattern. Baitfish imitations and Whistlers in white or bright colors work well. The water is very turbid, so visible flies that push water give me confidence. Flies that dive down to the bottom with lead eyes or a lead-wrapped body are often called for. Lengths from 2 ½ to 4 inches seem to work well.

A 9 weight rod is perfect for delivering these not-so-delicate offerings and controlling (trying to control?) a 15 pound catfish in strong current. My line choice is dictated by water depth and flow. I use whatever it takes to get down to the bottom. Sometimes a floater works but often it’s a 14 foot sink tip. Occasionally, a 350gr line with a fast sinking head is needed.

9 foot leaders are good when using a floating line and reaching for the bottom with a weighted fly. A 20 pound tippet helps pulls the fly out of rocky snags. Many cat-chasers don’t even bother with tapered leaders because the momentum of a weighted fly takes care of the turnover. With any type of sink tip, I normally just use 2 to 4 feet of 20# Maxima Monofilament – maybe a little more if the fly is heavily weighted and I want to get it deeper than the line.

There are at least a couple of guys who successfully pursue channel catfish at Lockport with spey rods. Although I have yet to try spey or switch tactics, they sound like a lot of fun. Catching a channel cat on a switch rod is actually a goal of mine for this coming season.

Although there is good fishing to be had from a boat, wading for channel catfish is the probably the most popular method for getting a fly in front of one. At Lockport, I would contend that a wading staff is a necessity, given the fact that seeing the rocky, treacherous bottom is generally impossible.

When hooked, a channel catfish is like a submarine. They pull hard and relentlessly. Did I mention a good disc drag reel and 100 yards of backing are a good idea? The chances of seeing your backing are actually pretty good…

Great catch Dale!
My most memorable day catfishing on the Red River took place during early July. It had been a wet spring and the water was quite high. A flood diversion channel flows into the river about a half mile downstream of the dam; when the Red River is high, catfish have a tendency to stack into this channel, especially when the high water corresponds to their spawn. I was camped out where a small riffle spread across this channel. Every couple minutes I could see the broad back of a catfish swimming up through the riffle. It was like watching salmon swim upstream. In calmer water close to shore, I would see catfish swirl and pods of minnows erupt from the water.

A small, 2 inch Clouser did a great job imitating those minnows and the catfish were all over it. Every 5 or 6 casts would result in a grab. Most of the cats were between 25 and 30 inches, with a few pushing the 35 inch mark. Almost every one stretched my fly line and backing clear across to the opposite shore. I definitely lost way more than the half dozen I landed.

Even if you can’t make it to Lockport, there is probably a catfish river somewhere close to where you live. Look for shallower water where catfish might feed. And throw your fly in there!


Dale Martens

Dale,
Thank you for the very interesting article, something most fly anglers would not think of. I have seen a few cats caught on a fly on the John Day River while fishing for bass. Sounds like you have the perfect ingredients for a unique spey rod fishery!
Thanks again, Travis Duddles


Below are some resources if you are interested in fly fishing the Red River near Lockport, Manitoba. A lot of fly fishermen stop off in Winnipeg on their way to fishing lodges in northern Manitoba. Winnipeg is very close to Lockport; why not spend a day or two chasing channel cats?

http://flyfishingmanitoba.proboards.com (This is a bulletin board where a lot of ardent, catfish-chasing fly rodders hang out.)

https://anglers.travelmanitoba.com/master_angler_search.asp (This search engine gives you all kinds of catch data for fishing in Manitoba.)

Read more

Kamis, 31 Maret 2016

Running out of time

0


One of the problems with having a fixed-term parliament is that the final stages of the parliamentary term risk degenerating into a fag-end of miscellaneous business, while ministers increasingly focus their attentions on the forthcoming election campaign. Commentators have already noted that the current parliamentary session contains a significantly reduced number of Bills compared with an average session but, despite this, time is rapidly running out in which to clear up remaining legislative proposals that the government would like to bring into force before the election. There certainly isn’t time now to introduce any new Bills, and so it is just a question of taking pending Bills through their remaining stages, and laying statutory instruments in parliament to deal with the various subordinate legislation that the government has announced its intention of making.

In the meantime, ministers seem to be resorting to the rather pointless exercise of putting down resolutions to record their future intent in the event that they were to be re-elected, in a vain attempt to commit a future government to a certain course of action, or simply to try to ‘wrong foot’ the opposition on particular issues.

The House of Commons rises for the Christmas recess today and will return on Monday 5 January. The Lords rose yesterday and will return on 6 January. There will then be a ‘half-term’ recess for both houses from 12 to 23 February, and Parliament will be dissolved on Monday 30 March 2015. This may be preceded by prorogation, marking the formal end of the parliamentary session, although the House of Commons may decide that it will not prorogue prior to dissolution. In any event there is now precious little parliamentary time left in which to complete unfinished business – barely 5 weeks in January/February, and then another 5 weeks to the end of March – 10 weeks in all for Bills to complete their remaining stages and obtain Royal Assent.

One piece of legislation that is of interest to planners (and to property owners in Greater London) is the Deregulation Bill. It contains a clause (currently Clause 33) which will come into immediate effect upon Royal Assent, and will give the Secretary of State power to make a statutory instrument relaxing, to some (as yet unspecified) extent, section 25(3) of the Greater London (General Powers) Act 1973, so as to allow some types of short-term lettings in Greater London that are currently prohibited by that sub-section of the 1973 Act. If the government wants to give effect to this change before the General Election, they will need to be drafting the necessary statutory instrument now, so that it can be laid before parliament without delay after the relevant section of what will then be the Deregulation Act 2015 comes into force.

In order to give sufficient time for parliamentary scrutiny of the SI (admittedly theoretical rather than actual, as an SI of this sort is never actually debated), it should be laid before both houses no later than mid-February, bearing in mind the impending dissolution at the end of March. But the Bill is still going through its committee stage in the Lords, and it must be a moot point as to whether it can complete its remaining stages in time to gain Royal Assent before the half-term break which starts on 12 February.

This is not the only problem now facing the government as the sands of time run out. The same timetabling considerations would apply to other subordinate legislation that the government has announced its intention to introduce. The Chancellor of the Exchequer uncharacteristically resisted the temptation to re-announce these proposals in his Autumn Statement earlier this month, but there is no reason to believe that the government has abandoned their intention to make further planning changes by fresh amendments to the General Permitted Development and to the Use Classes Order. On the other hand, the proposal to consolidate the GPDO, the UCO and also the Development Management Procedure Order may have to await the attention of the next government.

We have been promised a further amendment to Part 3 of the Second Schedule to the GPDO to permit the change of use of light industrial units (B1(c)), warehouses and storage units (B8) and some sui generis uses (launderettes, amusement arcades/centres, casinos and nightclubs) to residential use (C3), and changes of certain sui generis uses to restaurants (C3) and leisure uses (D2), plus the change of use to a widened retail (A1) class from betting shops and pay day loan shops (A2), restaurants and cafés (A3), drinking establishments (A4), and hot food takeaways (A5).

On the other hand, the intention to make permanent those permitted development rights which currently expire in May 2016 could be postponed for the time being. If the present government were to find themselves still in power after May 7 (which does seem a little improbable) there would be plenty of time before 30 May 2016 for them to make these further changes.

The right to make alterations to commercial premises so as to facilitate commercial filming, the installation of larger solar panels on commercial buildings, minor alterations within waste management facilities and for sewerage undertakers, and further extensions (in addition to those already allowed) to houses and business premises may or may not feature in the expected subordinate legislation in the New Year, and the same may apply to the proposed changes to Classes A1 and A2 of the Use Classes Order, which may involve the merger of these two use classes in a single new ‘town centre’ use class, so as to create a much more flexible range of uses in our High Streets, while at the same time restricting the scope of what is currently Class A2, so that betting offices and pay-day loan shops (both currently falling within this Use Class) will become sui generis uses.

I confess that I am a little hazy when it comes to the finer details of the negative resolution procedure, but I believe that a 40-day period has to be allowed for this purpose in most cases, even though such statutory instruments come into effect more or less automatically, without ever having been discussed or debated. If that is right, then Uncle Eric would need to lay these further statutory instruments before parliament between 6 January and 12 February in order to be sure that they can take effect before the General Election.

So we shall just have to watch and wait, to see whether the expected subordinate legislation does come forward in the coming weeks. If not, then it will depend on the policies of the ministers who are in office after the General Election as to whether these and the other planning changes that the present government has proposed will ever be brought forward.

© MARTIN H GOODALL

Read more

Rabu, 23 Maret 2016

Further planning changes put off until after the General Election

0


In the interval between Christmas and the New Year, De-CLoG sneaked out its “Ninth Statement of New Regulation: January to June 2015”, which (if what it says on the tin is to be believed) lists all the subordinate legislation that De-CLoG ministers intend to bring into force between 1 January and 30 June 2015. The word “all” is not actually used in the document, but it is reasonable to assume that if the government had a firm intention to introduce any other measures before the General Election they would have been included in this document.

The statement is therefore unintentionally revealing in having omitted a number of significant planning changes which were loudly trumpeted by ministers last year, and which would certainly have been included in the list of forthcoming measures if the government still intended to bring them forward before the General Election.

Among the previously proposed changes about which the document is deafeningly silent are further amendments to the GPDO to enable more changes of use in addition to those previously introduced within the past two years. These were expected to include the change of use of light industrial units (B1(c)), warehouses and storage units (B8) and some sui generis uses (launderettes, amusement arcades/centres, casinos and nightclubs) to residential use (C3), and changes of some sui generis uses to restaurants (C3) and leisure uses (D2).

There is no mention, either, of the government’s intention to make permanent those permitted development rights which currently expire in May 2016. We had been promised that the existing time limit for completing office to residential conversions would be extended from 30 May 2016 to 30 May 2019. It doesn’t look as this is going to happen this side of the General Election. The same applies to the right to build larger domestic extensions (under Part 1), currently expiring in May 2016.

Another measure that it seems will not be coming forward is the right to make alterations to shops, so as to allow retailers to alter their premises, plus additional PD rights covering (among other things) further extensions to houses and business premises, over and above existing permitted extensions.

Turning to the Use Classes Order, there is no mention of the proposed merger of Use Classes A1 and A2 in a single new ‘town centre’ use class. This was expected to be accompanied by a further amendment of the GPDO to allow change of use to the widened retail (A1) class from betting shops and pay day loan shops (A2), restaurants and cafés (A3), drinking establishments (A4), and hot food takeaways (A5). Similarly there is no mention of the intended restriction of the scope of the current A2 use class, so that betting offices and pay-day loan shops (both currently falling within this Use Class) would become sui generis uses.

Another measure of which no mention is made is the suggested increase in floorspace in a building in retail use (including the introduction of mezzanine floors), currently limited to 200 sq m, that can be made without its coming within the definition of development under section 55 (and therefore requiring planning permission). [I thought the original provision in the 2004 Act had been brought into force with effect from 10 May 2006, but I haven’t been able to put my finger on the SI which confirmed this limit, and have begun to wonder whether this provision in the 2004 Act is actually in force. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.]

There is one measure (relating to a proposed reduction in qualifying time for the Right to Buy scheme) which has been pencilled in for April 2015, but is flagged up as being “dependent on the Deregulation Bill”. The same would apply to the previously announced intention to relax section 25(3) of the Greater London (General Powers) Act 1973, so as to allow some types of short-term lettings in Greater London that are currently prohibited by that sub-section of the 1973 Act. But in this case, there is no mention of the proposed measure in the De-CLoG statement. Is this another measure that has bitten the dust?

Perhaps it was the realisation that these various measures could not now be brought forward before the General Election that led to George Osborne refraining from re-announcing them yet again in his Autumn Statement.

In Cloud-cuckoo-land, where Tory members of our coalition government seem to live, it is confidently expected that the government will be able to introduce these various measures after the General Election, and in the meantime they will no doubt feature as commitments in the Tory Party election manifesto. In the real world, where the rest of us live, the survival of the present government after May seems a little less than probable. An incoming government of a different political composition may not wish to continue with these proposals, and so this may be the end of the road for the present government’s planning ‘reform’ agenda.

UPDATE: I am grateful to Sally Davis of G L Hearn and to Ray Tutty of Savills, both of whom kindly emailed me with a note of the provision that I had been unable to find, which specifies the limit for internal enlargements of retail floorspace. This was Article 4 of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) (Amendment) (England) Order 2006, which inserted Article 2A in the original DMPO stating that the amount specified under section 55(2A) of the Act is 200 square metres. Any change in this floorspace limit would therefore be by means of a further amendment of the DMPO. It would still be possible for this change to be made in the time available, but its omission from the statement of forthcoming subordinate legislation suggests that the government may not see it as a priority.

NOTE: As readers are no doubt well aware, the coalition government did manage at the last minute to make the promised changes to the GPDO. For completely up-to-date and fully comprehensive coverage of this subject, we would strongly recommend readers to obtain a copy of the author’s new book - “A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO PERMITTED CHANGES OF USE” published by Bath Publishing in October 2015. You can order your copy by clicking on the link on the left-hand sidebar of this page.

© MARTIN H GOODALL

Read more

 
Powered by Blogger